4.7 - Content Options: Considerations with Online Publisher Resources

  • Reading time: 4 min.
  • Video time: 0

Publishers "add value" to traditional textbooks by offering online resources that complement or even replace the text. These resources typically include a digital version of the text along with exercises and activities that can supplement your own course design. These options can make publisher course materials very attractive, but they also contribute to publisher course material prices remaining very high in many disciplines (skip ahead to the next page if you'd like to learn about no- and low-cost alternatives to using publisher materials in your classes).

If you are interested in using a publisher's online resources in a class, in addition to the quality and cost of the materials, there are some other important considerations for you to explore and perhaps discuss with disciplinary colleagues and/or your textbook rep. The following considerations are derived from the CVC-OEI policy Links to an external site. on the use of proprietary materials in CVC-OEI exchange classes.

  • Accessibility: Don't assume that third party resources comply with LATTC requirements for online courses to use materials that comply with accessibility regulations. First, look at the list of approved vendors Links to an external site.. If you don't see yours on this list, ask the vendor for a VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) that discloses areas where the digital resources may not be in compliance. Follow these steps to adopt a new product. If a product does not meet all accessibility standards, it is possible to still use it. You would to complete and submit an EEAAP (Equally Effective Alternate Access Plans) -- your plan for how you will offer alternatives to your students who may have difficulty using the product due to a disability.
  • Regular and Substantive Interaction: Even the most interactive, engaging, personalized software developed by a third party cannot substitute for the regular and substantive interaction between instructor and students (and among students) required by external regulations and LACCD AP 4105.
  • Student Privacy: A third party system which is not run by LATTC College may enable access to educational records in violation of FERPA. Ask for a statement of how the system complies with FERPA requirements for student privacy. Dave Green at the district office can help evaluate compliance of third party technologies with security and privacy standards.
  • Title 5 Requirements for Materials Access Options:
    • According to Title 5 §59400(b), students cannot be required to pay for access to electronic materials “designed primarily for administrative purposes, class management, course management or supervision.” Use Canvas as the primary location of your class, with publisher materials as a supplemental resource accessed via Canvas, rather than having students use only a third-party system which includes grading and other class management features.
    • According to Title 5 §59400(c), students must have options when purchasing temporary access to instructional materials ranging from the length of the class to at least two years.
  • Student Authentication: If students access the third party system through a login/password provided by the third party, the class runs a higher risk of being out of compliance with the student authentication requirements of LATTC's AP 4105. It is far better to integrate the third party system with Canvas so that student authentication occurs via LATTC-provided credentials. Your system may already be integrated in LATTC's Canvas system. Go to Settings > Navigation in your class to find the integrated vendors.

In addition to the regulatory issues above, course design and the student experience is also a potential concern. Publisher resources should generally be a supplement to a course you design given your teaching approach, knowledge of LATTC students, and the desired learning outcomes -- not a wholesale substitute. Students want to connect with their teacher and classmates in a familiar environment (e.g. Canvas). Simply sending students into a publisher's system to complete a class is not only less than optimal, it may violate federal standards for online education and your class may be recategorized as a "correspondence course". Correspondence course are not eligible for financial aid. Frankly, it is no different than walking into a classroom, saying "Go to the publisher's site", and walking out the door. Free, high-quality alternative course content may be worth considering. The next page features these options.